Task prioritization and optimization using interconnected data sources

ABSTRACT

A computer identifies a location that is associated with a task, included in a first list of tasks, based on a first information. The computer determines a first travel time from a second location that is associated with a mobile device to the first location based on a second information. The second information indicates an amount of travel time that is associated with a route from the second location to the first location. The computer generates a plurality of permutations of the tasks included in the first list of tasks. The computer selects a permutation from the plurality of permutations based on the first travel time. The computer generates a second list of tasks using the selected permutation. The organization of the tasks included in the second list of tasks reduces the travel time that is required to complete those tasks.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of task management,and more particularly to task prioritization.

Task management is the process of managing task through their life cycleand typically involves planning, testing, tracking and reporting. Taskmanagement applications allow users to visualize which tasks are to becompleted over a particular period of time and thereby assist usersmanage their schedules effectively. Effective task management requiresmanaging many aspects of a task, including associated status, priority,time, human and financial constraints, recurrence and notification.However, unforeseen complications can inhibit the completion of thetasks included in those schedules. For example, users may be stuck intraffic jams, waiting in lines, or waiting for delayed publictransportation, and are thus unable to complete tasks that they set outto complete.

SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present invention disclose a method, computer programproduct, and system for prioritizing tasks. A computer identifies afirst location that is associated with a first task, based, at least inpart, on a first information, wherein (i) the first task is included ina first list of tasks, (ii) the first information is retrieved from adigital data source, and (iii) the first information includes one ormore of: (a) a street address that corresponds to the locationassociated with the first task, (b) a review of a business related tothe completion of the first task (c) a global positioning system (GPS)coordinate of the location associated with the first task, or (d) a modeof transportation that is available based, at least in part, the secondlocation. The computer determines a first travel time from a secondlocation to the first location based, at least in part, on a secondinformation, wherein (i) the second location is associated with a mobiledevice that supplied the first list of tasks, (ii) the secondinformation includes data that indicates an amount of travel time thatis associated with a route from the second location to the firstlocation, (iii) the second information is retrieved from the digitaldata source, and (iv) wherein the second information includes one ormore of: a) a degree of congestion for a mode of transit; b) a measuredpattern of movement associated with a mode of transit; c) a pattern ofmovement for a mode of transit that is predicted to exist; d) a queuelength for a mode of transit at the first location; e) a queue lengthfor a mode of transit that is included in the route from the secondlocation to the first location; f) a social media posting related to thefirst location that indicates a degree of congestion for a mode oftransit; g) a current weather condition for the first location; or h) aforecasted weather condition for the first location. The computergenerates a plurality of permutations of the tasks included in the firstlist of tasks, wherein each permutation, of the plurality ofpermutations, respectively includes at least two of the tasks includedin the first list of tasks. The computer selects a first permutationfrom the plurality of permutations based, at least in part, on the firsttravel time. The computer generates a second list of tasks based, atleast in part, on the selected first permutation of the tasks, wherein(i) an organization of the tasks included in the second list of tasksreduces at least a second travel time that is required to complete atleast a portion of the tasks included in the second list of tasks, and(ii) the first travel time and the second travel time are estimated byusing both the first information and the second information as one orboth of variables or data points that are applied to a given route togenerate an estimated travel time that accounts for changes in anenvironment that includes that route. The computer determines a rankingfor a given permutation included in the plurality of permutations,wherein the ranking for the given permutation is based, at least inpart, on a fourth amount of travel time required to complete at least aportion of the tasks included in the given permutation, and wherein theselection of the permutation from the plurality of permutations isfurther based, at least in part, on the ranking of the given permutationwith respect to another permutation included in the plurality ofpermutations. The computer determines an updated location of the mobiledevice, based, at least in part, on an updated set of GPS coordinates ofthe mobile device. The computer determines a third travel time based, atleast in part, on the updated location of the mobile device and thelocation of a second task. The computer selects a second permutationfrom the plurality of permutations based, at least in part, on theupdated location of the mobile device and the location of the secondtask. The computer generates a third list of tasks based, at least inpart, on the selected second permutation of the tasks, wherein anorganization of the tasks included in the third list of tasks reduces athird travel time that is required to complete at least a portion of thetasks included in the third list of tasks.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram illustrating a distributedcomputing environment, in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart depicting operational steps of a task optimizationprogram program, on a computing device within the distributed computingenvironment of FIG. 1, in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 3 depicts a block diagram of components of the computing deviceexecuting the task optimization program, in accordance with anembodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention will now be described in detail with reference tothe Figures.

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram illustrating a distributedcomputing environment, generally designated 100, in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention. Distributed computing environment100 includes computing device 110, user communication device 140 allinterconnected over network 150. Computing device 110 includes taskoptimization program 120 and search engine 130.

In an embodiment, task optimization program 120, and search engine 130are stored on computing device 110. However, in other embodiments, taskoptimization program 120, and search engine 130 are stored externallyand accessed through a communication network such as network 150. Thecommunication network can be, for example, a local area network (LAN), awide area network (WAN) such as the Internet, or a combination of thetwo, and may include wired, wireless, fiber optic or any otherconnection known in the art. In general, the communication network canbe any combination of connections and protocols that will supportcommunications between computing device 110, user communication device140, task optimization program 120, and search engine 130, in accordancewith a desired embodiment of the present invention.

In various embodiments of the present invention, computing device 110can be a server, a laptop computer, a tablet computer, a netbookcomputer, a personal computer (PC), or a desktop computer. In anotherembodiment, computing device 110 represents a computing system utilizingclustered computers and components to act as a single pool of seamlessresources. In general, computing device 110 can be any computing deviceor a combination of devices with access to search engine 130, network150, and user communication device 140 and is capable of executing taskoptimization program 120, in accordance with an embodiment of thepresent invention. Computing device 110 may include internal andexternal hardware components, as depicted and described in furtherdetail with respect to FIG. 3.

In various embodiments of the present invention, user communicationdevice 140 may be a laptop computer, tablet computer, netbook computer,personal computer (PC), a desktop computer, a personal digital assistant(PDA), a smart phone, or any programmable electronic device capable ofcommunicating with computing device 110 and task optimization program120 via network 150 and with various components and devices withindistributed computing environment 100. In this embodiment, usercommunication device 140 includes hardware and software to determine itsglobal positioning system (GPS) location and to send that location tosearch engine 130 via network 150. In another embodiment, usercommunication device 140 represents a computing system utilizingclustered computers and components to act as a single pool of seamlessresources. In general, user communication device 140 can be anycomputing device or a combination of devices with access to network 150and is capable of communicating with task optimization program 120 viacomputing device 110, in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention. User communication device 140 may include internal andexternal hardware components, as depicted and described in furtherdetail with respect to FIG. 3.

In this embodiment, task optimization program 120 is a software programwhich receives a list of tasks from a mobile device of a user, e.g.,communication device 140, and returns a prioritized list of tasks to themobile device. Task optimization program 120 generates permutations ofthe tasks included in the list of tasks (i.e., sequences of the tasks)and determines a rating for each permutation. Task optimization program120 selects the permutation with the best rating and generates anoptimized list of the tasks, based on that permutation, and returns thatoptimized list to user communication device 140. In general, theoptimized list of the tasks minimizes the amount of travel time requiredto complete the tasks included in the list. It is to be understood thatthe use of the words “optimized” and “optimization” herein refers to anability to cause an improvement in the time required for taskcompletion, which may not be absolutely optimal in all interpretationsor embodiments, since there is often a tradeoff for a given improvement,while the word “optimal” refers to a result of the application of thatability. For example, the completion of one task is optimized while thecompletion of another task is exacerbated. As such the optimizationperformed by task optimization program 120 is in reference to theability of task optimization program 120 to cause an improvement in thetime required for completion of at least one task included in the listof tasks.

Search engine 130 is a program, such as a search engine, capable ofreceiving a search query and returning information related to thereceived search query. In this embodiment, the returned informationincluded information retrieved from the world wide web. In other words,search engine 130 is a source of digital data, i.e., a digital datasource. For example, to identify a particular location where the taskcan be completed, this information can be, for example, a street addressthat corresponds to the location associated with a task, a review of abusiness related to the completion of task, a global positioning system(GPS) coordinate of the location associated with the task, or a mode oftransportation that is available to travel to the location associatedwith the task, which can be further based on the location of the mobiledevice. In some embodiment, applicable modes of transportation include,for example, roadways, bus routes, train schedules, pedestrian walkways,bike paths etc.

Search engine 130 interacts with task optimization program 120 byproviding information related to each task within the list of tasksreceived from user communication device 140. In some scenarios theprovided information includes details that change an estimated traveltime, which often relates to a specific route that can be used from afirst location to a second location or vice versa. For example, theinformation can include one or more of: a) a degree of congestion for amode of transit; b) a measured pattern of movement associated with amode of transit; c) a pattern of movement for a mode of transit that ispredicted to exist; d) a queue length for a mode of transit at the firstlocation; e) a queue length for a mode of transit that is included inthe route from the second location to the first location; f) a socialmedia posting related to the first location that indicates a degree ofcongestion for a mode of transit; g) a current weather condition for thefirst location; or h) a forecasted weather condition for the firstlocation.

This information is applied, by task optimization program 120, to analgorithm that uses them as variables or data points that are applied toa given route to generate an estimated travel time that accounts forchanges in an environment that includes that route. This information canindicate an inhibition of travel, a facilitation of travel or may notaffect travel at all, depending on a particular scenario and task to becompleted. A degree of congestion for a mode of transit can be, forexample, a vehicular traffic jam or heavy pedestrian traffic on aparticular sidewalk, which may inhibit those forms of transit. Ameasured pattern of movement associated with a mode of transit can be,for example, data from surveillance equipment that indicates movement ofpeople or vehicles, which may inhibit or facilitate various forms oftransit. A pattern of movement for a mode of transit that is predictedto exist can be, for example, movement of vehicles and people duringrush hour, which may inhibit or facilitate forms of transit. A queuelength for a mode of transit at the first location can be, for example,long queue lengths to enter a venue or the number of people waiting toboard a public transportation system, which inhibits those forms oftransit. A queue length for a mode of transit that is included in theroute from the second location to the first location can be, forexample, the number of vehicles using a highway on ramp, which mayinhibit or facilitate vehicular transit. An applicable social mediaposting related to the first location that indicates a degree ofcongestion for a mode of transit can be, for example, a message postedon a social media site that indicates airplane flights have been delayedby one hour at a particular airport, which may inhibit that form oftransit. An applicable current weather condition for the first locationcan be, for example, data from weather instruments that indicate sunnyconditions with a temperature of seventy degrees Fahrenheit, which mayfacilitate multiple forms of transit. Lastly, a forecasted weathercondition for the first location can be, for example, below freezingtemperatures and a predicted snowfall of twelve inches, which mayinhibit or facilitate various forms of transit.

By using such information as variables or data points, the algorithm, oftask optimization program 120, generates an estimated travel time thataccounts for changes in an environment that interacts with a particularroute. For example, pedestrian traffic on one side of a city may notaffect vehicular traffic on the other. Certain information can thereforeindicate an increase in the estimated travel time while otherinformation can indicate a decrease, or neither, since certainenvironmental condition inhibit travel while other environmentalconditions facilitate travel. It should also be noted that certaininformation can facilitate one mode of transportation while inhibitinganother, or may do neither. For example, a snow fall of fifteen inchesinhibits automobile and walking modes of transit while facilitatingmodes of transit that require snow, e.g., a snowmobile and skiing.However, the user of the mobile device is utilizing an underground trainsystem that is not affected by the snow. As such, the algorithm takesinto account available modes of transit, which can be specified by theuser of the mobile device, when determining an estimated travel time.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart, 200, depicting operational steps of taskoptimization program 120 for organizing a list of tasks such that theorganization of those tasks optimizes their completion, in accordancewith an embodiment of the present invention.

In step 205, task optimization program 120 receives a list of tasks froma user of user communication device 140. The list of tasks includes oneor more tasks; wherein each task can include a description of anactivity to be completed, a location of an activity to be completed, ora combination of the two. Typically, each task in the list of tasks fromuser communication device 140 includes an associated type of location ora user specified location where a given task is to be completed. Forexample, a task “get a haircut” is associated, by the user with salon A.In another example, task optimization program 120 associates “get ahaircut” with a type of task location such as barbershops and hairsalons. In certain embodiments, task optimization program 120 usessearch engine 130 to identify types of task locations that will allowthe needed resources to complete a given task. In such embodiments, taskoptimization program 120 associates each received task with at least onepossible type of task location, hereafter denoted as a “task location”.

The current location of the user, hereafter denoted as a “user location”is calculated by task optimization program 120, in step 210. In thisexemplary embodiment, the user location is calculated based on globalpoisoning system (GPS) co-ordinates. However, in other embodiments theuser location is determined based on a proximity to a point of interestor another known location.

Task optimization program 120 determines whether a task, included in thelist of tasks, has been specified, i.e., selected by the user, indecision step 215. If the user has made such a specification, i.e., atask was selected, (decision step 215, yes branch), then taskoptimization program 120 proceeds to step 225. In general, the user mayspecify any task included in the list of tasks received from usercommunication device 140, in accordance with an embodiment of thepresent invention. If however, the user has not made such aspecification, i.e., a task was not selected, (decision step 215, nobranch), then in step 220, task optimization program 120 individuallyevaluates the tasks, included in the received list of tasks, based onthe task locations associated with the respective tasks. To evaluate thetasks, task optimization program 120 determines and compares thedistances, i.e., the amount of travel time required, from eachrespective task location to the location of user communication device140. In general, a shorter distance is preferable and, as such the tasklocations are organized into a list of task locations based on which istask location is closest to user communication device 140. However, incertain embodiments, additional criteria are applied. For example,certain tasks may have higher priority for completion than other tasksand as a result their associated task locations are listed higher in thelist of task locations. Based on this evaluation, task optimizationprogram 120 selects a task location, corresponding to a task included inthe received list of tasks, e.g., the task location that is listed firstin the list of tasks. To select a task, task optimization program 120evaluates the associated task locations in a sequential order in whichthey appear in a sequence of task locations that has the highest rating.For further details regarding ratings of task location sequences and theselection of such a sequence for use by task optimization program 120,see step 235.

In general, a specific task location is selected, by task optimizationprogram 120, based, in part, on a rating respectively associated withthe sequence of the task locations and on the association of tasks withspecific task locations. The sequence of task locations that has thehighest rating is used, by task optimization program 120, as a startingpoint to select a task location, where an associated task is to beperformed. If specific locations have been associated with the tasksincluded in the list of tasks, then those locations are included in thesequence of task locations. In such a scenario, task optimizationprogram 120 selects the task location that is listed at the beginning ofthe sequence of task locations and proceeds to step 225. If however,specific locations have not been associated with the tasks included inthe list of tasks, then, to select a specific task location, in step220, task optimization program 120 uses external feedback information,provided by search engine 130, to select a task location from thesequence of task locations.

For example, a user selects a task, e.g., “go to drycleaner”.Optimization program 120 determines that a specific task location is notassociated with that task. As such, task optimization program 120 usesexternal feedback information, provided by search engine 130, to selecta task location based on a type of task location that is associated withthe task “go to drycleaner”. In some embodiments, task optimizationprogram 120 compares the keywords included in a task to a database toidentify and associate a type of task location with a particular task.In some circumstances, the retrieved types of task locations, providedby search engine 130, are based on a key word or key phrase searchexecuted by task optimization program 120 via search engine 130. In thisexample, a key word search, provided by search engine 130, would includethe word “drycleaner”, which would generate a list of physical locationsthat offer dry-cleaning services. This list of physical locations, i.e.,possible task locations, can be further refined, by search engine 130 inconjunction with task optimization program 120, and based on otherinformation, such as the user location.

The selection of a specific task location, in the case where specificlocations have not been associated with the tasks, can be furtherrefined based on external information that is associated with specifictask locations such as, for example, a rating, a review, a social mediapost, posted hours of operation. The selection of a specific tasklocation can be further refined based on a schedule of other tasks theuser must complete. For example, task optimization program 120 receivesthe task “get breakfast”. Task optimization program 120 utilizesfeedback, provided by search engine 130, which includes a set of reviewsof restaurants that are within a five hundred meter proximity of theuser, to select a restaurant which serves breakfast, has the highestaverage user satisfaction and has the shortest current queue of users.In this scenario, the shortest current queue of users refers to theshortest queue of patrons waiting to pick up orders, waiting to beseated etc.

After a task location is selected in step 220, task optimization program120 retrieves GPS co-ordinates of the selected location from a searchengine, such as search engine 130, in step 225.

In step 225 task optimization program 120 retrieves information thatindicates the task location. In this embodiment, the task locationincludes GPS co-ordinates for the specified task location from a searchengine such as search engine 130.

In step 230, task optimization program 120 calculates the travel timefrom the user location to the task location, based on the retrievedco-ordinates of the user location and the task location. For example,the travel time is calculated based on information received from asearch for directions, via search engine 130, using the user locationand the task location co-ordinates as query variables. Additionalinformation used by task optimization program 120 to determine traveltime can include, for example, a route to a task location, trafficpatterns present within a route to a task, traffic patterns which emergeat various times during the day, or a weather forecast.

In decision step 235, task optimization program 120 determines whetherthe sequence in which the tasks, included in the list of tasks, areoptimally organized such that the completion of those tasks in thespecified order will result in an expenditure of a minimal amount oftime on the part of the user. To check for such an optimal organizationof the tasks, task optimization program 120 utilizes one or both ofinformation included in the files and applications, which includesresults generated by search engine 130, included with computing device110 and external information included in the files and applicationsincluded with computing device 140. Task optimization program 120 usesthis internal and external information to evaluate the organization ofthe tasks included in the list of tasks based on, for example, theexpected duration of a task, the expected queue at a task location,traffic patterns present within a route to a task, traffic patternswhich emerge at various times during the day, a weather forecast, orschedule constraints such as work or entries in a digital planner of theuser, e.g., a digital calendar in user communication device 140 thatincludes scheduled social events. If the sequence in which the tasks areoptimally organized (decision process 235, yes branch), then taskoptimization program 120 proceeds to decision step 240. If the sequencein which the tasks are not optimally organized (decision process 235, nobranch), then task optimization program 120 proceeds to step 220.

To determine whether the tasks are in an optimal organization, taskoptimization program 120 generates a number of permutations of thosetasks, i.e., possible sequences of those tasks, and assigns ratings toeach possible sequence. For example, the list of tasks includes tasks A,B and C. The possible six permutations for those tasks are 1) A, B, C;2) A, C, B; 3) B, A, C; 4) B, C, A; 5) C, A, B; and 6) C, B, A. Therating for each of the respective permutations is based, in thisembodiment, on a total amount of estimated travel time, which is basedon the external information received. The total amount of estimatedtravel time is the amount of time that is required for the user totravel to all the task locations, in the order specified by thesequence. In other embodiments, a subset of the tasks included in thesequence is used when determining a rating. For example, a user only hasthree hours of time available in which to complete tasks and the totalestimated time to complete all the tasks in the list of tasks is sevenhours, excluding travel time. As such, the user selects an option oftask optimization program 120 that limits the rating assessment to onlythe first three tasks in a given sequence of tasks and adds a timelimit, as criteria for determining sequence ratings, of three hours(i.e., a threshold). The first three tasks in sequence 1 have anestimated total travel time of forty five minutes and the tasksthemselves are estimated to require a total of two hours to complete.The other possible sequences, 2-5, exceed the three hour time limit, andas such receive a lower rating that sequence 1. The sequence whichreceives the highest rating is determined to be the optimal organizationof those tasks. As such, task optimization program 120 determineswhether the sequence of the tasks included in the list of tasks matchthe sequence of tasks in the optimal organization of those tasks, i.e.,the sequence with the highest rating. If task optimization program 120determines that there is a match between the two sequences, then taskoptimization program 120 determines that the list of tasks is optimallyorganized.

In this embodiment of the present invention, task optimization program120 determines which sequence includes the most optimal organizationbased on which sequence has the highest overall rating. However, inother embodiments, ratings are determined by task optimization program120 based on one or more specific characteristics that a user chooses tooptimize, such as an overall time to complete the list of tasks, a totalamount of time spent waiting in queues, a total amount of time spentdriving, or any other condition related to the completion of the list oftasks. In such embodiments the specific characteristics are presented asselectable thresholds or criteria that are applied to determine whichsequence has the highest rating.

In decision step 240, task optimization program 120 determines whetherthe user location has changed, by re-calculating the location of theuser, using an updated GPS location of user device 140, and comparingthat location to the user location, which was calculated in step 210. Ifthe user location has changed (decision process 240, yes branch) thentask optimization program 120 proceeds to step 210. A change in userlocation is a change in location wherein the difference exceeds apredetermined threshold. For example, a user walking across a room isnot a significant enough change in location to exceed the threshold.However, the user of user communication device 140 being five hundredfeet away from the initial user location does exceed the predeterminedthreshold. In some embodiments, task optimization program 120 uses aratio of the change in user location compared to the total distancebetween two determined user locations, determined in step 210, and theaverage distance between the task locations in the sequence to determinewhether the user location has changed. For example, the average distancebetween task locations is 10,560 feet and the actual change in the userlocation is one hundred feet. The threshold requires that a ratio ofactual change in the user location to average distance between tasklocations exceed 0.01. In this case, the ratio is 100/10,560 orapproximately 0.0095, which is far less than 0.01. As such taskoptimization program 120 determines that the user location has notchanged. If the location of the user has not changed (decision process240, no branch), then the final prioritized list of tasks is created,based on the sequence that was determined to have the highest rating,and is passed to user communication device 140, in step 245.

FIG. 3 depicts a block diagram, 300, of components of computing device110 in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presentinvention. It should be appreciated that FIG. 3 provides only anillustration of one implementation and does not imply any limitationswith regard to the environments in which different embodiments may beimplemented. Many modifications to the depicted environment may be made.

Computing device 110 includes communications fabric 302, which providescommunications between computer processor(s) 304, memory 306, persistentstorage 308, communications unit 310, and input/output (I/O)interface(s) 312. Communications fabric 302 can be implemented with anyarchitecture designed for passing data and/or control informationbetween processors (such as microprocessors, communications and networkprocessors, etc.), system memory, peripheral devices, and any otherhardware components within a system. For example, communications fabric302 can be implemented with one or more buses.

Memory 306 and persistent storage 308 are computer-readable storagemedia. In this embodiment, memory 306 includes random access memory(RAM) 314 and cache memory 316. In general, memory 306 can include anysuitable volatile or non-volatile computer-readable storage media.

Task optimization program 120 and search engine 130 are stored inpersistent storage 308 for execution and/or access by one or more of therespective computer processors 304 via one or more memories of memory306. In this embodiment, persistent storage 308 includes a magnetic harddisk drive. Alternatively, or in addition to a magnetic hard disk drive,persistent storage 308 can include a solid state hard drive, asemiconductor storage device, read-only memory (ROM), erasableprogrammable read-only memory (EPROM), flash memory, or any othercomputer-readable storage media that is capable of storing programinstructions or digital information.

The media used by persistent storage 308 may also be removable. Forexample, a removable hard drive may be used for persistent storage 308.Other examples include optical and magnetic disks, thumb drives, andsmart cards that are inserted into a drive for transfer onto anothercomputer-readable storage medium that is also part of persistent storage308.

Communications unit 310, in these examples, provides for communicationswith other data processing systems or devices, including resources ofnetwork 150 and user communication device 140. In these examples,communications unit 310 includes one or more network interface cards.Communications unit 310 may provide communications through the use ofeither or both physical and wireless communications links. Taskoptimization program 120 and search engine 130 may be downloaded topersistent storage 308 through network 150.

I/O interface(s) 312 allows for input and output of data with otherdevices that may be connected to computing device 110. For example, I/Ointerface 312 may provide a connection to external devices 318 such as akeyboard, keypad, a touch screen, and/or some other suitable inputdevice. External devices 318 can also include portable computer-readablestorage media such as, for example, thumb drives, portable optical ormagnetic disks, and memory cards. Software and data used to practiceembodiments of the present invention, e.g., task optimization program120 and search engine 130, can be stored on such portablecomputer-readable storage media and can be loaded onto persistentstorage 308 via I/O interface(s) 312. I/O interface(s) 312 also connectto a display 320.

Display 320 provides a mechanism to display data to a user and may be,for example, a computer monitor.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product. The computer program product may include a computerreadable storage medium (or media) having computer readable programinstructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of thepresent invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, andconventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computeror entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example,programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), orprogrammable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readableprogram instructions by utilizing state information of the computerreadable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry,in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that the computerreadable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises anarticle of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects ofthe function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram blockor blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of theorder noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

The programs described herein are identified based upon the applicationfor which they are implemented in a specific embodiment of theinvention. However, it should be appreciated that any particular programnomenclature herein is used merely for convenience, and thus theinvention should not be limited to use solely in any specificapplication identified and/or implied by such nomenclature.

It is to be noted that the term(s) “Smalltalk” and the like may besubject to trademark rights in various jurisdictions throughout theworld and are used here only in reference to the products or servicesproperly denominated by the marks to the extent that such trademarkrights may exist.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer program product for prioritizingtasks, the computer program product comprising: one or morecomputer-readable storage media and program instructions stored on theone or more computer-readable storage media, the program instructionscomprising: program instructions to identify a first location that isassociated with a first task, based, at least in part, on a firstinformation, wherein (i) the first task is included in a first list oftasks, (ii) the first information is retrieved from a digital datasource, and (iii) the first information includes one or more of: (a) astreet address that corresponds to the location associated with thefirst task, (b) a review of a business related to the completion of thefirst task (c) a global positioning system (GPS) coordinate of thelocation associated with the first task, or (d) a mode of transportationthat is available based, at least in part, the second location; programinstructions to determine a first travel time from the second locationto the first location based, at least in part, on a second information,wherein (i) the second location is associated with a mobile device thatsupplied the first list of tasks, (ii) the second information includesdata that indicates an amount of travel time that is associated with aroute from the second location to the first location, (iii) the secondinformation is retrieved from the digital data source, and (iv) whereinthe second information includes one or more of: a) a degree ofcongestion for a mode of transit; b) a measured pattern of movementassociated with a mode of transit; c) a pattern of movement for a modeof transit that is predicted to exist; d) a queue length for a mode oftransit at the first location; e) a queue length for a mode of transitthat is included in the route from the second location to the firstlocation; f) a social media posting related to the first location thatindicates a degree of congestion for a mode of transit; g) a currentweather condition for the first location; or h) a forecasted weathercondition for the first location; program instructions to generate aplurality of permutations of the tasks included in the first list oftasks, wherein each permutation, of the plurality of permutations,respectively includes at least two of the tasks included in the firstlist of tasks; program instructions to select a first permutation fromthe plurality of permutations based, at least in part, on the firsttravel time; program instructions to generate a second list of tasksbased, at least in part, on the selected first permutation of the tasks,wherein (i) an organization of the tasks included in the second list oftasks reduces at least a second travel time that is required to completeat least a portion of the tasks included in the second list of tasks,and (ii) the first travel time and the second travel time are estimatedby using both the first information and the second information as one orboth of variables or data points that are applied to a given route togenerate an estimated travel time that accounts for changes in anenvironment that includes that route; program instructions to determinea ranking for a given permutation included in the plurality ofpermutations, wherein the ranking for the given permutation is based, atleast in part, on a fourth amount of travel time required to complete atleast a portion of the tasks included in the given permutation, andwherein the selection of the permutation from the plurality ofpermutations is further based, at least in part, on the ranking of thegiven permutation with respect to another permutation included in theplurality of permutations; program instructions to determine an updatedlocation of the mobile device, based, at least in part, on an updatedset of GPS coordinates of the mobile device; program instructions todetermine a third travel time based, at least in part, on the updatedlocation of the mobile device and the location of a second task; programinstructions to select a second permutation from the plurality ofpermutations based, at least in part, on the updated location of themobile device and the location of the second task; and programinstructions to generate a third list of tasks based, at least in part,on the selected second permutation of the tasks, wherein an organizationof the tasks included in the third list of tasks reduces a third traveltime that is required to complete at least a portion of the tasksincluded in the third list of tasks.